Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on e mail. Or follow us on Google News!
My expertise watching the transition from fossil fuelled transport to electrical automobiles has taught me that there’s all the time some foundation for the FUD. A quoted statistic, that 1 in 3 drivers are supposedly giving up on EVs and going again to petrol, has some fact. Nevertheless, what I often discover is that there are extenuating circumstances and it’s all the time exaggerated. I doubt that the recidivism charge has ever been as excessive as 30%, and it’s extra seemingly round 3%. However within the muddy waters of mainstream media, it’s all the time tough to search out out what is definitely happening.
Looking out Quora reveals a number of anecdotes from individuals who have given up on EVs. The commonest causes look like: vary nervousness, charging inconvenience (not sufficient high-speed chargers, condominium residing), or selection — can’t match my canine, youngsters, and so forth. into my Nissan Leaf.
Here’s a typical submit from 4 years in the past: “The Leaf was a rather early model, and had only 136 HP of power. For different reasons I am now driving an ICE car with approximately 300 HP. It shouldn’t even be a contest, right? In real life city traffic (up to 40 mph/70 kph) the Leaf was so much faster than my current car. Remember, the electric drivetrain can react in milliseconds. A normal engine needs a full second, maybe even two, to get up to the right rpm, figure out which gear to use, etc. I feel like it takes forever. When the gaps are opening and closing in traffic, it feels like I am driving around in a huge truck in comparison to my ‘old’ Leaf. If I ever will buy another car, I will stretch far to make it an electric one.”
What’s frequent amongst these tales on Quora is that they’re outdated. Some over 4 years. That’s virtually neolithic contemplating the speed of improvement of electrical automobiles. My Tesla Mannequin 3 is 5 years outdated and I confer with it as an vintage. The opposite commonality is that each one of those issues have been solved in probably the most half. Most new EVs have ranges over 400 km; high-speed chargers are arising all over; kerbside charging options abound (kerb charge is only one instance); and if you wish to transport a soccer staff or a Nice Dane, you’ll be able to all the time purchase a Kia EV9. Keep in mind that a lot of the BEVs on the street immediately didn’t exist 3 years in the past.

This present article was impressed by my good buddy Arthur Huntwho shared this instance of what occurs once you transition again to a petroleum automotive, if you find yourself used to driving electrical:
“I’m at present home sitting with my spouse in Sydney for relations who’ve additionally kindly left their automotive for us. Nevertheless, driving a petroleum automotive within the metropolis, even an automated, offers a pointy distinction to driving our Tesla at residence. What have we seen? We want a key to unlock the automotive and begin it. We have now to launch the parking brake earlier than driving away. We have now to take our left hand off the steering wheel to vary gears. The engine hurries up and slows down because the gears change. We have now to make use of the foot brake to sluggish the automotive down.
“The engine keeps on idling when we are stopped at traffic lights. The air conditioning won’t work if we turn the engine off. We have to check our speed frequently as there is no adaptive cruise control. We can’t reclaim any energy when we coast downhill. We will have to visit a service station to refuel. We will have to check the engine oil and water before we go on a longer trip. With the petrol price in Sydney at $2.28, it is no wonder we are seeing lots of EVs.”
You may be glad to know that Arthur is safely again at residence in Regional Queensland together with his Tesla.
So, are drivers going again to petrol after driving EVs, and in that case, what number of? I’d doubt if this phenomenon is happening in Norway. Nevertheless, there could also be some fact in it in different much less mature markets.
A survey conducted in the UK in March 2024 by Top Gear found: “In the UK, a survey of 1,619 EV drivers in Britain conducted by the Electric Vehicle Association (maybe it has an agenda but the data is real) found that 91 per cent of respondents with a driveway wouldn’t go back to combustion, and even 88 per cent of those who have no driveway — and so overwhelmingly have to public charge — also said they wouldn’t go back. Overall, it’s 91 per cent wouldn’t go back, six per cent don’t know and just four per cent definitely would go back.” That’s a determine that is sensible to me.
Then there was this unbelievable declare from McKinsey: “… 46 percent of EV drivers in the U.S. said they’re likely to go back to a traditional engine in their next vehicle. Across the globe, the biggest concern for the consumers was not the cars themselves, but the inadequate public charging infrastructure where they live, which could leave them stranded on the road, especially on long trips. The cost of upkeep and maintenance is also an obstacle that many EV owners struggle to overcome. He acknowledged that part of the problem is that charging stations are often hidden from view, leaving drivers struggling to find a place to plug in. ‘Part of availability is visibility,’ he said. ‘You can’t keep chargers hidden behind a Walmart.’” (Editor’s notice: This determine doesn’t appear to make any sense. The vast majority of EVs offered within the US have been Teslas, and the overwhelming majority of Tesla homeowners have stated they’d purchase one other Tesla once more, or no less than one other EV. It looks as if one thing was misplaced in translation right here. —Zach)
Hidden chargers shouldn’t be an issue for these driving EVs that inform you the place the chargers are, or for cell phone customers with the PlugShare app. Individuals not driving EVs already may very well be forgiven for pondering that there aren’t any chargers round. Training is certainly wanted. However 46%, come on!
Value of repairs and upkeep. Like to know the small print on this. A member of the family just lately had his outdated Mazda 3 serviced and graciously shared the bill with me. A normal service price him AUD$240 — together with oil disposal. A lot of the work that needed to be completed was on components that don’t exist on a BEV. They even stung him with AUD$25 to exchange his wiper blades. Sure, I do know that BEVs have wiper blades they usually have to get replaced. My Tesla Mannequin 3 had the wiper blades modified in my drive means for AUD$17.

An article discussing the McKinsey report on Teslarati obtained over 150 feedback, most of which had been sceptical, some questioning the bias of questions. Some urged that since Tesla has half the market, these wanting to return to petrol had been the non-Tesla homeowners. Different surveys point out that 90% of Tesla homeowners would purchase one other Tesla. Others thought that maybe these surveyed didn’t even personal an EV. The query was requested who paid for the survey? Maybe it was funded by the oil firms? Is it only a rigorously curated pattern of culled knowledge to fulfill the needs of those that paid McKinsey to do the work?
It could be nice to see additional surveys — I’d count on there can be conflicting outcomes relying on the geographical space and the survey sponsor. Extra muddy waters or a mature dialogue? One can solely hope. Up to now, I see no proof of a mass defection of drivers giving up on EVs.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us here.
Newest CleanTechnica.TV Movies
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage here.