Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or follow us on Google News!
Trying by way of Lazard’s latest LCOE (levelized price of vitality) report, along with the important thing headline factors on renewable energy costs vs. fossil fuel and nuclear energy costsI ran throughout some attention-grabbing notes the analysts made about vitality storage initiatives within the USA. Specifically, Lazard highlighted some results of the IRA (Inflation Discount Act of 2022) which jumped out to me.
For one, the IRA is resulting in bigger vitality storage initiatives that may last more as their authentic battery capacities degrade and diminish. Notably, constructing bigger initiatives that last more, Lazard is projecting higher long-term monetary returns for the mission homeowners. Total, the purpose is that the IRA brings down vitality storage system prices.
“Despite the significant increases in wholesale pricing for lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide observed from 2022 to 2023, the IRA’s grant of ITC eligibility for standalone ESS assets kept LCOS v8.0 values relatively neutral as compared to LCOS v7.0. One year later, for this year’s LCOS v9.0, ITC implementation, including the application of energy community adders, is fully underway and the impacts are clear. The ITC, along with lower cell pricing and technology improvements, is leading to an increasing trend of oversizing battery capacity to offset future degradation and useful life considerations, which is not only extending useful life expectations but is also increasing residual value and overall project returns.”
Secondly, nevertheless, there have been some delays in initiatives shifting ahead as questions remained about battery provide chain guidelines. Time is cash, and any delays in initiatives shifting ahead include some prices, however hopefully that’s being cleared up if it isn’t already.
Thirdly, due to IRA laws, Lazard expects increasingly more stationary battery storage initiatives will use battery cells and underlying battery supplies that come from the US — moderately than China, for instance. Although, what’s unclear at this level is how these adjustments will affect prices. In fact, that will likely be a altering matter as nicely — utilizing battery elements produced within the US could price extra initially, however these prices ought to come down over time as battery part manufacturing scales up and business synergy varieties in North American areas.
“While the ITC and energy community adder are prevalent, the domestic content adder remains uncertain, notwithstanding the various domestic manufacturing announcements,” Lazard writes. “The lack of clarity related to qualifying for local content is leading to longer lead times and higher contingencies. Adding to this overall complexity is the recently proposed increase of Section 301 import tariffs on lithium-ion batteries, which many believe will lead to increased domestic battery supply but with uncertain costs results.”
So, that’s the story on storage. It was additionally mentioned together with wind and photo voltaic in my first article about the new Lazard report. Examine that out should you haven’t learn it but, or dive all the best way into the full Lazard report.

Hat tip to “earwig” for sharing the brand new Lazard report with us and pushing for some protection.
Associated: Utilities: Batteries Are Most Commonly Used for Arbitrage & Grid Stability
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us here.
Newest CleanTechnica.TV Movies
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage here.