Puerto Rico Sues Fossil Fuel Companies For Damages From Global Heating

Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on e mail. Or follow us on Google News!

Puerto Rico filed swimsuit towards fossil gasoline firms this week, The Verge reviews. The criticism claims these firms misled the general public about local weather change and delayed a transition to scrub vitality. The swimsuit seeks $1 billion in damages to assist Puerto Rico defend itself towards local weather disasters. In a criticism filed in San Juan yesterday, the Puerto Rico Division of Justice stated the businesses violated commerce legislation by selling fossil fuels with out adequately warning concerning the risks. The defendants embody ExxonMobil, BP, Chevron, Shell, ConocoPhillips, and different vitality firms.

It’s the most recent in a slew of lawsuits trying to carry fossil gasoline firms accountable for the implications of local weather change. Greenhouse fuel emissions from fossil fuels are supercharging storms and different excessive climate occasions whereas rising seas eat away at island shorelines. Fossil gasoline firms have recognized for many years that their merchandise would trigger international warming from analysis achieved by their very own scientists and went forward doing enterprise as ordinary anyway.

Within the criticism, Puerto Rico says it expects to pay billions of {dollars} sooner or later to deal with catastrophes made worse by local weather change — together with storms like Hurricane Maria, which killed 1000’s of individuals in 2017 and triggered energy outages that lasted for months in some circumstances. The swimsuit asks defendants to contribute to a fund that will be used to mitigate the implications of local weather change and pay for measures to strengthen Puerto Rico’s infrastructure towards future climate-related calamities. Thirty seven municipalities in Puerto Rico and the capital metropolis of San Juan have beforehand filed swimsuit towards fossil gasoline firms, looking for to carry them accountable for the devastation wrought by Hurricane Maria.

“It’s more important than ever for officials to stand up to the fossil fuel industry on behalf of their communities. The people of Puerto Rico deserve their day in court to hold Big Oil accountable,” Richard Wiles, president of the Middle for Local weather Integrity that tracks local weather circumstances and supplies authorized help, stated in an emailed assertion.

The Case In opposition to Fossil Gas Corporations

The Division of Justice for Puerto Rico says on its website that regardless of the businesses figuring out that their merchandise have induced and can proceed to trigger extreme harm and air pollution in Puerto Rico and its pure assets, the businesses have distributed, marketed, and promoted their merchandise in Puerto Rico by way of unfair and misleading commerce practices. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants failed to supply applicable warnings concerning the dangers related to the supposed use of their merchandise, however as an alternative improperly promoted them, concealing from the general public the risks of which they had been conscious. Additionally they applied refined communications and public relations campaigns to deceive the general public concerning the results of fossil gasoline use.

In consequence, the folks of Puerto Rico have incurred and can incur billions of {dollars} in prices to scrub up the disasters brought on by local weather change, similar to coastal erosion brought on by rising sea ranges, the formation of more and more frequent and extreme storms, excessive flooding, destruction of coral reefs and mangrove forests, degradation of air and water high quality, lack of habitats and species, amongst different devastating impacts of local weather change on the island.

“These companies have known internally for decades that greenhouse gas pollution from fossil fuel products would have adverse impacts on the global climate and sea levels. With that knowledge, they took steps to protect their own assets from climate damage and risks, through massive internal investment in research, infrastructure improvements, and plans to exploit new business opportunities in a warming world. However, they failed to truthfully warn Puerto Rican consumers about the consequences of using and burning fossil fuels on the Island, as well as their impact on the environment. It is time for them to mitigate the damage they have caused to Puerto Rico and not for Puerto Ricans to foot the bill,” stated the Secretary of Justice.

The lawsuit alleges that, to this present day, the defendants proceed to deceive the general public by falsely and misleadingly selling their merchandise as local weather pleasant and positioning themselves as advocates for a low-carbon future, whereas failing to acknowledge that consumption of their merchandise is a major driver of local weather change. Along with environmental damages, the lawsuit contains claims for unfair and misleading acts or practices in commerce, product legal responsibility, public nuisance, and punitive damages as a result of the defendants’ wrongful acts or omissions had been achieved willfully or with gross disregard for all times, security, and property.

This swimsuit additionally seeks to compel the defendants to contribute to an equitable fund to mitigate the continuing damages to Puerto Rico and strengthen public infrastructure towards sea degree rise and storm harm, restore pure assets, fund native local weather resilience measures, and rebuild pure boundaries to guard communities from sea degree rise and climate-influenced atmospheric phenomena. The lawsuit arose after a research performed by the Puerto Rico Local weather Change Council in 2022. It’s based mostly on the Environmental Public Coverage Act, the Puerto Rico Antitrust Act, the Civil Code of 2020, and the Code of Civil Process.

Good Luck, Puerto Rico

Dozens if not lots of of comparable authorized actions have been introduced by US states, cities, cities, counties, civic organizations, backyard golf equipment, and ebook teams over the previous 10 years. Up to now, not one penny in compensation has been paid, which makes these bulletins much less newsworthy as time goes by. They might present alternatives to junior attorneys to shine their abilities at drafting authorized complaints, however in any other case are little greater than feelgood workouts with no prospect of success. One of many primary ideas of the legislation is that justice delayed is justice denied. Thus far, all of those lawsuits whole bupkes in the case of justice being served.

Now, the MAGA lunatics funded by Charles Koch and the Federalist Society are taking steps to guard these climate criminals in perpetuity by asking the US Supreme Court docket to achieve down from on excessive, rip these circumstances away from state courtsand make a remaining and determinative ruling that insulates these firms from any liability for their crimes in perpetuity, simply as they did for Donald Trump. Based mostly on the beautiful and outrageous rulings by the Supreme Court docket in its final time period that resulted in June, the courtroom might be anticipated to do precisely that. In any case, they had been positioned on the courtroom by oil cash particularly to guard these firms from ever having to face justice. They know what is predicted of them and can faithfully shield their masters.

Should you suppose the Supremes wouldn’t dare to slap down the states which have sued the fossil gasoline firms as a result of it could symbolize a gross intrusion into their energy to handle harms that straight have an effect on their residents, suppose once more and go learn the choice in Bush V. Gore another time. The New York Times reported in June that the Supreme Court docket has requested the Biden administration’s solicitor normal for its opinion on the appeals. Which will sound like a technicality, however to authorized consultants, it’s a signal that the case has the eye of the justices. The Supreme Court docket critiques many appeals every year, however solely seeks enter from the solicitor normal in circumstances it’s actively contemplating taking on.

Whether or not the circumstances are heard underneath federal or state legislation issues. The cities and states bringing these circumstances consider they’re extra prone to win underneath state legislation. The oil firms and their attorneys consider they are going to fare higher underneath federal legislation. Ted Boutrous, counsel for Chevron, stated in a press release that the problems at stake within the Hawaii case had been past the boundaries of state legislation and that “these meritless state and local lawsuits violate the federal constitution and interfere with federal energy policy.”

The Drumbeat For Fossil Gas Safety Grows Louder

In current weeks, conservative teams have been operating advertisements and writing opinion items urging the Supreme Court docket to dismiss an identical case introduced by the town and county of Honolulu. A few of that stress marketing campaign was funded by teams linked to Leonard Leo, the conservative activist who has labored for many years to shift the courtroom to the proper, in response to reviews in The Guardian, E&E Informationand Rolling Stone. Leo, in flip, is the handpicked stooge of Charles Koch, who years in the past selected him to be the purpose particular person for the Federalist Society, which has chosen all six of the intense right-wing judges presently on the courtroom. “Big Oil companies are fighting desperately to avoid trial in lawsuits like Honolulu’s,” Richard Wiles, president of the Middle for Local weather Integrity, informed the New York Occasions.

The Supreme Court docket’s 6-3 conservative majority, which has largely been deferential to enterprise pursuits, may be anticipated to be sympathetic to the oil firms. If the Supreme Court docket take up the Honolulu case, it might nicely articulate its views on the right methods through which states and cities can, and can’t, search cures from fossil gasoline firms. How the courtroom comes down on this central situation would doubtless have an effect on the handfuls of different comparable circumstances introduced by California, Massachusetts, and different cities and states across the nation. It could additionally doubtless inform the litigation that’s inevitably going to be introduced towards the so-called “Climate Superfund” legislation lately adopted by the state of Vermont

Should you thought the MAGA crazies had been all about states’ rights, guess once more. Firstly, they’re about defending the fossil gasoline business and can cheerfully throw blue states underneath the bus if that’s what it takes to guard their purchasers. We’d want issues had been in any other case, however they don’t seem to be. The US authorities is now a hostage of the fossil gasoline business. Any rights the folks might need will likely be subordinated to these of Exxon and its fellow local weather criminals. As George Carlin tried to inform us, the oil and fuel enterprise is a superb huge membership — and also you’re not in it. Anybody who thinks the Supreme Court docket goes to guard states or particular person residents over the fossil gasoline giants is delusional. Sorry, that’s simply the way in which it’s in America at present.

Featured picture by Jeremy Buckingham, CC-BY 2.0 licenseby way of Flickr.