E-Bike Incentive Programs Need Well-Defined Goals To Be More Effective

Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on e mail. Or follow us on Google News!

Incentive applications meant to catalyze the adoption of greener, cleaner, low carbon applied sciences, comparable to we’ve seen with photo voltaic and EVs, and most just lately e-bikes, could be efficient if completed proper, however when a cookie-cutter one-size-fits-all strategy is used, they’ll find yourself being not very cost-effective or environment friendly in transferring the needle towards the specified end result.

A current research analyzing the “consumer purchase response” to current e-bike incentive applications means that these applications could possibly be extra equitable, cost-effective, and environment friendly if they start with the tip in thoughts. In essence, beginning out with clear and well-defined objectives for incentive applications is critical for designing, funding, and implementing them with most effectiveness.

The research, “Consumer purchase response to e-bike incentives: Results from a nationwide stated preference study,” was printed within the journal ScienceDirect this previous April, with the authors stating in its Summary that it’s “among the first to experimentally analyze prospective purchase behavior of e-bike consumers to assess price sensitivity, behavioral response to incentives, and consumer value of e-bike attributes.”

“Purchase incentives offset the price of an e-bike for consumers, with the goal of increasing e-bike adoption and ownership. While programs initially offered incentives of $300 or less, amounts have progressively increased over time. The 2023 legislative cycle has seen a notable expansion in state- and province-level purchase assistance programs, as well as the re-introduction of a proposed federal tax credit known as the “E-BIKE” Act. Regardless of the rising funding allotted to e-bike buy incentives, there’s little proof as to their cost-effectiveness or optimum design.”

Among the outcomes of the research are fairly simple, and maybe no-brainers:

Level-of-purchase reductions are less expensive than rebates or tax credit for exciting further e-bike adoption
Price-effective e-bike incentives require equal quantities offered throughout commonplace and cargo e-bike sorts, and require the biggest incentives be offered to these within the 200–300% FPL (Federal Poverty Stage) revenue vary

Nevertheless, one discovering that basically stood out was this (emphasis added):

“(W)e discover that even when e-bike incentive applications are designed cost-effectively, the prices per ton of CO2 diminished nonetheless far exceed these of alternate options or cheap social prices of GHG emissions. We conclude that the argument for allocating public funds for e-bike incentive applications should be primarily based on the co-benefits of e-bike journey and possession, and never solely on GHG discount.

Should you don’t have time (or entry) to learn the total textual content, an article published on GovTech about the study presents an excellent abstract and a few further insights direct from the authors. For instance, “it takes about $4,000 worth of incentives to induce that extra e-bike purchase,” which far exceeds the advantages gained by displacing carbon emissions as a result of adoption of that e-bike.

As we’re more likely to see lots of political pushback on any and all authorities incentive applications for cleaner transport and vitality within the US in coming years, utilizing the findings of this research — and others prefer it which will observe — could possibly be a key aspect in designing and funding efficient applications within the close to future.