Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Wind & Solar Researcher: “We Are Actually Trying to Use the Natural Variability Itself to Address the Variability.”

Share

Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on e mail. Or follow us on Google News!


Deciding the place to construct a photo voltaic or wind farm? MIT engineers present how detailed mapping of climate circumstances and power demand can information optimization for siting renewable power installations.

Before now, there have been few built-in sources for combining knowledge from particular person builders or utilities, which made it extra guesswork to decide on and plan renewable power websites effectively. MIT engineers not too long ago modified that. They reveal how exact mapping of power consumption and climate patterns could direct the location of renewable power installations with excessive effectivity.

Qiu
“We are actually trying to use the natural variability itself to address the variability.” Liying Qiu, Lead Writer, Postdoctoral Affiliate. Picture courtesy of WITH.

Latest analysis demonstrates that the design of renewable energy crops will be considerably impacted by regional-level planning that makes use of fine-grained climate knowledge, power demand knowledge, and power system modeling. Moreover, this leads to operations which might be extra profitable and environment friendly.

Liying Qiu, the lead writer of the current research within the journal Cell Reports Sustainabilityexplains that together with her group’s new method, “we can harness the resource complementarity, which means that renewable resources of different types, such as wind and solar, or different locations, can compensate for each other in time and space. This potential for spatial complementarity to improve system design has not been emphasized and quantified in existing large-scale planning.”

“We are actually trying to use the natural variability itself to address the variability,” she explains. “Such complementarity will become ever more important as variable renewable energy sources account for a greater proportion of power entering the grid,” she says. The thought is to “coordinate the peaks and valleys of production and demand more smoothly.”

Studying via her work, it seems to be a complete equilibrium of climate and power with a excessive stage of thought and investigation.

Sometimes, in planning large-scale renewable power installations, Qiu says it’s been free and broad-brushed — “some work on a country level, for example, saying that 30 percent of energy should be wind and 20 percent solar. That’s very general.”

For this research, the group analyzed each climate knowledge and power system modeling at a spatial scale of lower than 10 kilometers (roughly 6 miles).

“It’s a way of determining where we should exactly build each renewable energy plant, rather than just saying this city should have this many wind or solar farms,” she interprets.

Decarbonized power system planning with high-resolution spatial illustration of renewables lowers price.
gr1 lrg scaled
“Research framework (example of ISONE) (A) Two different meteorological datasets (WRHigh and WRLow) are used in this study. The mean wind speed (WS) and direction, and the mean daily Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) over 2007–2013 are shown over ISONE. (B) The meteorological data are processed to generate hourly capacity factors (CFs) for each cell in the latitude-longitude grid, constructed at the resolution used for energy system optimization (OpRes). The mean WS, GHI, and CFs for ERCOT and CAISO are shown in Figure S1. (C) The hourly CFs are input to spatially explicit energy system modeling. (D) An example time series shows time-varying demand (black, dashed, left axis) and total vRE generation (solid, left axis) for systems designed using minCost (red) and maxAEP (blue) strategies. The shaded area indicates the net load (the difference between demand and vRE generation, right axis). The data shown cover a 6-day window selected for explanatory purpose.”

As a way to maximize using renewable sources, the outcomes reveal the benefits of coordinating the location of photo voltaic farms, wind farms, and storage methods whereas accounting for native and temporal fluctuations in wind, sunshine, and power demand. The researchers found that this technique can maximize the supply of unpolluted energy when wanted whereas minimizing the requirement for important storage investments and, consequently, the general system price.

gr2 lrg scaled
“(A and B) Locations and capacities of wind (A) and solar (B) farms from minCost (red) and maxAEP (blue) strategies. (C) Mean differences (minCost-maxAEP) in wind (green) and solar (pink) generations (lines, left axis) and net load (shaded, right axis). (D) Costs of different technologies obtained from minCost (solid) and maxAEP (hatched). The values are the difference between minCost and maxAEP (relative to maxAEP) in total system costs. Results are from simulations using WRHigh with OpResWind = 0.04° and OpResSolar = 0.14° at vRE penetration level of 100% planned over 2007–2013 for ISONE. (E)–(H) and (I)–(L) are the same as (A)–(D) but for the cases in ERCOT and CAISO, respectively, tested over 2011.” Picture from Cell Reports Sustainability.

“The study, which will appear in the journal Cell Reports Sustainability, was co-authored by Liying Qiu and Rahman Khorramfar, postdocs in MIT’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and professors Saurabh Amin and Michael Howland.”

gr5 lrg scaled
“Impacts of land-use restrictions and wake effect Locations of wind (green) and solar (pink) farms under different restrictions. Column 1: baseline scenario with no land-use restrictions or consideration of aerodynamic wake effects in wind farms. Column 2: land-use restrictions considered. Column 3: wake effects in wind farms considered. Column 4: both land-use restrictions and wake effects considered. The black values on columns 2–4 are the relative differences of cost against the baseline scenario (column 1, Billion USD (B$)). Rows 1 and 3 are from minCost optimizations, and rows 2 and 4 are the corresponding maxAEP systems. The red values on rows 1 and 3 are the relative difference against maxAEP systems (rows 2 and 4). All the results are planned with OpResWind = 0.04° and OpResSolar = 0.14° using the planning period of 2007–2013 at penetration level of 100% for ISONE.”

To assemble their knowledge and allow high-resolution planning, the researchers used various till now unintegrated sources. They employed high-resolution meteorological knowledge from the Nationwide Renewable Power Laboratory, which is publicly obtainable at 2-kilometer decision however isn’t utilized in a planning mannequin of this wonderful scale.

“These data were combined with an energy system model they developed to optimize siting at a sub-10-kilometer resolution. To get a sense of how the fine-scale data and model made a difference in different regions, they focused on three U.S. regions — New England, Texas, and California — analyzing up to 138,271 possible siting locations simultaneously for a single region.”

By evaluating the outcomes of siting primarily based on a typical technique vs. their high-resolution method, the group confirmed that “resource complementarity really helps us reduce the system cost by aligning renewable power generation with demand,” which ought to translate on to real-world decision-making, Qiu says. “If an individual developer wants to build a wind or solar farm and just goes to where there is the most wind or solar resource on average, it may not necessarily guarantee the best fit into a decarbonized energy systems.”

Energy provide and consumption fluctuate hourly and month-to-month because the seasons change. “What we are trying to do is minimize the difference between the energy supply and demand rather than simply supplying as much renewable energy as possible,” Qiu says. “Sometimes your generation cannot be utilized by the system, while at other times, you don’t have enough to match the demand.”

Rahman Khorramfar, additionally a postdoc in MIT’s Division of Civil and Environmental Engineering, says that this work “highlights the importance of data-driven decision making in energy planning.” The work exhibits that utilizing such high-resolution knowledge coupled with a fastidiously formulated power planning mannequin “can drive the system cost down, and ultimately offer more cost-effective pathways for energy transition.”

In keeping with the researchers, its framework is extraordinarily adaptable to anyplace, accounting for native geophysical and different components. Peak west winds in Texas, for instance, come within the morning, however they happen within the afternoon on the south coast, so the 2 naturally improve one another.

In New England, as an example, the brand new analysis signifies that extra wind farms needs to be inbuilt areas with a superb wind useful resource at evening, when photo voltaic power is missing. Some areas are windier at evening, whereas others have extra wind through the day.

Shocking Information: Important Beneficial properties Leads to Much less Want for Power Storage

“One thing that was surprising about the findings, says Amin, who is a principal investigator in the Laboratory of Information and Data Systems, is how significant the gains were from analyzing relatively short-term variations in inputs and outputs that take place in a 24-hour period. “The kind of cost-saving potential by trying to harness complexity within a day was not something that one would have expected before this study,” he says.

As well as, Amin says, it was additionally stunning how a lot this type of modeling may cut back the necessity for storage as a part of these power methods. “This study shows that there is actually a hidden cost-saving potential in exploiting local patterns in weather that can result in a monetary reduction in storage cost.”

The system-level evaluation and planning steered by this research, Howland says, “changes how we think about where we site renewable power plants and how we design those renewable plants so that they maximally serve the energy grid. It has to go beyond just driving down the cost of energy of individual wind or solar farms. And these new insights can only be realized if we continue collaborating across traditional research boundaries by integrating expertise in fluid dynamics, atmospheric science, and energy engineering.”

agro image5 e1723052039896
Deer graze underneath the PV array at NREL’s Nationwide Wind Expertise Heart. Incorporating native vegetation underneath and round photo voltaic panels can create habitat for native wildlife and bugs whereas bettering soil circumstances. Picture by Dennis Schroeder, NREL.

Supply: MIT News, David L. Chandler

Screen Shot 2024 11 29 at 3.03.54 PM



Chip in just a few {dollars} a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to speed up the cleantech revolution!


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us here.


Join our each day e-newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or join our weekly one if each day is simply too frequent.


Commercial




CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage here.

CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy




Our Main Site

Read more

More News