How Much Are Robotaxi Utopia Promises Simply Myths?

Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on electronic mail. Or follow us on Google News!

A lot of the dialogue round robotaxis lately is targeted on how nicely they work and the way rapidly they will scale up and reproduce. Nonetheless, among the preliminary premises on why robotaxis might be good and useful have in all probability not gotten sufficient consideration. Bloomberg not too long ago interviewed former director of the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Company Jeffrey Tumlin about robotaxis. He supplied numerous very attention-grabbing solutions. I’m highlighting just a few particular ones right here to tease out some themes.

To start with, one key level he makes is that Uber and Lyft didn’t obtain among the key issues they had been supposed to attain. Briefly, they created extra visitors whereas displacing biking and transit journeys.

“One of many issues that I discover fascinating concerning the robotaxi business is it seems to have discovered nothing from the expertise of Uber and Lyft.

“Lower than 1% of Uber and Lyft journeys within the Bay Space connect with transit. However within the late 2000s, the businesses made all these lofty guarantees that they had been going to be a vital first/last-mile connector to public transportation. They believed that the existence of ridehail would allow people to shed cars as a result of there would all the time be a automobile there while you want it.

“Not only did none of those promises come true, the opposite actually occurred. The San Francisco County Transportation Authority did an analysis in 2018 showing that almost half the increase in vehicle miles traveled in San Francisco was due to Uber and Lyft. They were displacing transit, walking and biking trips, they were adding to deadheading miles, and they were significantly increasing traffic in the most congested parts of the city.”

Elsewhere within the interview, simply specializing in the robotaxis which have been roaming round San Francisco, he mentioned, “So far, there is no net positive for the transportation system that we’ve been able to identify. The robotaxis create greater convenience for the privileged, but they create problems for the efficiency of the transportation system as a whole.” So, once more, whereas they might profit some people who find themselves in a position to afford them, they clog up the streets and improve time in visitors.

He repeated it in different phrases right here as nicely: “At the same time, it’s an incredibly inefficient use of roadway space. Flooding the city with Waymos would significantly increase congestion and allow the streets to move fewer people, which threatens San Francisco’s economic vitality. That’s particularly true if those Waymo trips are substituting for walk, bike or transit trips.” There’s no approach round it — driving round with an empty SUV or van whereas ready for a passenger, driving to choose up the passenger, after which taking the passenger the place they need to go provides as much as extra miles on the highway than standard types of transport.

“It goes back to this fundamental tension between convenience for the wealthy versus the needs of the transportation system as a whole. For private AV companies to be viable, they need to target wealthy folks in dense locations where vehicles don’t spend all their time on the road deadheading.” Are robotaxis ever going to do greater than serve the rich? Perhaps. If robotaxi firms — whether or not Waymo, Tesla, or Baidu — can finally drive down prices and be helpful to these with much less revenue, nice. Nonetheless, if that’s achieved, that can inevitably result in much more visitors — and that’s actually not nice for anybody.