Tuesday, April 29, 2025

How Bad Is Renewable Energy Misinformation? Take A Look

Share

Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on electronic mail. Or follow us on Google News!


I spend about 5 hours going by means of information day by day, doing analysis for my weblog. Just lately, I began seeing a number of cases of posts going surfing over the course of a day, usually over a number of days. One factor that I seen about this was that the headlines appeared to be anti-renewable. MSN appeared to be doing this particularly. I made a decision to look into it.

It seemed to me just like the articles have been being reposted from different sources. MSN might need been reposting issues from different media sources with out truth checking and might need been an unintentional participant within the misinformation.

Getting a bit fed up, I made a decision to do an experiment. I did a search by means of Google of the phrases “renewable MSN,” limiting the search to information that appeared on-line over the newest 24 hours. I did this a number of occasions over the course of a number of days. All however one search returned related outcomes. The outcomes from the exception seemed largely regular.

For instance, on January 13, I received sixteen outcomes for the “renewable MSN” search. I divided them into those who have been constructive or correct on renewable vitality and those who have been unfavorable and (fairly clearly, for my part) unfaithful. The search outcomes that I name constructive have been the next 4:

  1. CT urged to increase renewable energy to cut ratepayer costs

  2. 6 Renewable Energy Projects That Are Changing Local Communities

  3. Understanding Renewable Energy: Separating Facts from Myths

  4. Promising Advances in Renewable Energy Development

Twelve of the sixteen posts have been what I name unfavorable. Their titles are as follows:

  1. The Renewable Energy Bubble: Are We Headed for an Economic Disaster?

  2. The Renewable Mirage: Why We’re Betting on Technologies That Don’t Deliver

  3. The Renewable Energy Myth: Why It’s Not as Clean as You Think

  4. Blackouts and Grid Instability in Renewable-Heavy Nations

  5. How Renewable Energy Is Destroying Natural Habitats

  6. The Cost of Going Green: Why Renewable Energy Is Driving Energy Prices Up

  7. Top 10 Hidden Costs of Renewable Energy Nobody Talks About

  8. Ed Miliband’s ‘obsession’ with renewables as bills reach record high (probably true, however slanted)

  9. The Land Use Crisis in Renewable Energy

  10. The Hidden Cost of Renewable Energy Expansion

  11. How Renewable Energy Projects Harm the Environment

  12. Why Renewable Energy Is Not the Ultimate Solution to Climate Change

That’s three posts of what I consider have been misinformation for each one which I can regard as merely reporting information. Generally, the posts that have been unfavorable weren’t supported with references, and so they have been generalized of their statements. In contrast, those who have been constructive about renewables just about caught to science on local weather change and browse like regular, considerate articles.

Fascinated by what number of posts there have been and the way usually that they had been going up, I attempted doing searches on a few of the titles. In every case, I solely received one outcome, even though I had really seen the identical title again and again throughout extra normal searches made on the identical day earlier. I’m not positive why this occurred, however clearly the search engine had options that enabled it.

Fascinated by figuring out how this was occurring elsewhere, I did different, related searches. One instance, “renewable ‘Fox News’” returned nearly nothing. Others had a couple of extra posts listed, however not sufficient to attract conclusions.

I don’t consider that MSN was actively attempting to deceive folks. My impression is the MSN reposts issues from different information websites, and so they have been doing this unaware that they have been being utilized in a misinformation rip-off. Perhaps I’m flawed about this, however I’ve determined to be very cautious about citing MSN as a supply of data in any writing I do.

Somehow, it’s clear to me that there are individuals who have turn out to be very efficient at creating untruth-drivel and posting it in locations the place unsuspecting abnormal folks would discover it. And since it’s posted again and again, folks begin to see it as one thing that’s broadly reported.

There are explanation why folks consider that local weather change will not be actual, renewables are harmful to the atmosphere, wind generators kill extra birds than they save, photo voltaic panels drip poison into water tables, and so forth. Not solely have they got dangerous info; they’ve an enormous quantity of it. And it might come from sources they regard as impartial.

Clearly some persons are actively engaged in mendacity to all the remainder of us. However they don’t seem to be simply abnormal folks. They’re specialists, extremely expert at transferring others away from the reality and towards falsehoods that help our being depending on fossil gas firms. They act as if they’re in a conspiracy to maintain us from coping with local weather change. As a lot as such folks ought to be castigated, I really feel sorry for them. I do consider they are going to be cursed by their very own grandchildren.



Chip in a couple of {dollars} a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to speed up the cleantech revolution!


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to counsel a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us here.


Join our day by day e-newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or join our weekly one if day by day is simply too frequent.


Commercial




CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage here.

CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy




Our Main Site

Read more

More News