Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on electronic mail. Or follow us on Google News!
Final Up to date on: 18th March 2025, 08:24 pm
Ammonia’s hydrogen promise is like making an attempt to make use of a funnel as a soup bowl — a number of it would find yourself in your garments. Fans tout ammonia (NH₃) as a magic hydrogen provider, conveniently sidestepping the small drawback that changing it again into helpful hydrogen is inefficient, costly, and wasteful. This isn’t a small hiccup, it’s an vitality hemorrhage.
Sure, ammonia is a widely known industrial chemical with an current provide chain, and sure, it comprises a number of hydrogen. However until you propose on working engines straight on ammonia (which has its personal set of issues), it’s essential crack it again into hydrogen for gas cells or different purposes. And that’s the place your entire premise collapses.
Cracking ammonia to extract hydrogen is a pricey, energy-intensive, and loss-heavy course of. The U.S. Division of Vitality (2023) finds that ammonia cracking loses 30-40% of its vitality, making it an absurdly inefficient hydrogen provider in comparison with alternate options. Adochiei et al. (2023) verify this, displaying ammonia’s round-trip effectivity is as little as 20–30%, considerably worse than liquid hydrogen and even some liquid natural hydrogen carriers (LOHCs). Should you’re planning a future primarily based on ammonia, you’re baking in large vitality losses proper from the beginning.
That signifies that at lifelike prices of $6 per kg for hydrogen at the start of the method, hydrogen would value $20 to $30 per kg. That’s 10 or extra instances the fee per gigajoule of LNG imports. Getting ammonia imports to be merely much more costly than LNG requires $1 per kg hydrogen, which is clearly not occurring besides with grime low-cost pure fuel and unabated steam reformation on typical pure fuel fields. That’s not a local weather resolution.
Utilizing ammonia as a gas straight (somewhat than cracking it) is one other nonstarter. Burning ammonia produces nitrogen oxides (NOx), that are main air pollution. In accordance with Valera-Medina et al. (2018), NOx emissions from ammonia combustion should not trivial and would require costly after-treatment methods. In contrast to hydrogen combustion, which primarily produces water vapor, ammonia burning throws in some air air pollution for good measure.
The European Fee (2022) evaluated ammonia’s economics and located cracking ammonia provides important prices to the hydrogen provide chain. Hydrogen created from ammonia is just costlier than producing hydrogen regionally. The push to make ammonia a worldwide hydrogen provider assumes low-cost inexperienced ammonia manufacturing, low-cost transport, and environment friendly cracking, all of that are removed from actuality at present.
Bloomberg Inexperienced (Khan, 2023) additionally highlights ammonia’s security dangers — leakage issues, toxicity, and dealing with complexity — points that additional drive up prices. If hydrogen’s financial viability is already questionable, ammonia makes it worse.
The push for ammonia as a hydrogen provider usually comes with a false dilemma: both we use ammonia, or we have now no viable hydrogen transport resolution. This ignores the fact that transporting hydrogen for vitality is simply a foul thought in comparison with constructing plenty of wind, photo voltaic, storage and transmission, with HVDC bringing what vitality is required from outdoors of nations and offering geographical hedging for vitality era.
Ammonia as a hydrogen provider is a foul thought wrapped in infrastructure hype. It loses vitality at each step, provides pointless prices, and introduces new security and environmental dangers. There are higher clear vitality options than hydrogen. Should you’re investing in ammonia-to-hydrogen schemes aside from making fertilizer, be ready to spill a number of your soup in your pants.
References
- Adochiei, F. C., Stroe, D. I., & Christensen, A. B. (2023). Challenges in ammonia as a hydrogen provider: Vitality effectivity and conversion losses. Worldwide Journal of Hydrogen Vitality, 48(12), 5897–5913.
- Valera-Medina, A., Xiao, H., Owen-Jones, M., David, W. I., & Bowen, P. J. (2018). Ammonia for energy: A overview on its prospects, applied sciences, and challenges. Progress in Vitality and Combustion Science, 6963–102.
- Qiu, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, X., & Ding, Y. (2021). Comparative life-cycle evaluation of hydrogen carriers: Ammonia, liquid hydrogen, and LOHCs. Vitality Studies, 73950–3962.
- European Fee. (2022). Ammonia as a Hydrogen Provider: Technical and Financial Limitations. Brussels: European Union.
- U.S. Division of Vitality (DOE). (2023). Hydrogen Storage and Transportation: Evaluating Ammonia’s Function. Washington, DC: DOE.
- Khan, B. (2023, July 15). Ammonia’s hydrogen potential faces critical effectivity and security challenges. Bloomberg Inexperienced.
Whether or not you might have solar energy or not, please full our latest solar power survey.
Chip in a number of {dollars} a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to speed up the cleantech revolution!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us here.
Join our each day e-newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or join our weekly one if each day is simply too frequent.
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage here.
CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy
