Trump’s DOE Swings At Clean Energy & Accidentally Hits A Bullseye

Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on e-mail. Or follow us on Google News!

In a transfer that stunned completely nobody, the Trump/Wright Division of Vitality started swinging the axe at clear vitality applications—however right here’s the twist: this time, they could unintentionally be getting a number of issues proper. Not as a result of they’ve out of the blue developed a coherent decarbonization technique or discovered faith on local weather coverage. No, their motivations are transparently petty and political—punish Democratic states, reallocate billions to fund tax cuts for billionaires, and sprinkle some red-state favoritism over the ashes. However amid the smoke and mirrors, a few of these cuts to hydrogen hubs and carbon capture projects—significantly those focusing on hydrogen for transportation—make extra sense than anybody on this administration in all probability realizes.

Let’s begin with the Pacific Northwest Hydrogen Affiliation. The DOE had earmarked round $1 billion for this mission, which is grounded in electrolytic hydrogen produced utilizing renewables. Their focus? The initiative aimed to decarbonize hard-to-electrify sectors equivalent to heavy-duty transportation, agriculture, and industrial operations, together with fertilizer and cement manufacturing. Largely vitality use instances with a aspect serving to of ammonia fertilizer, the one worth proposition there. I gained’t mourn this hub.

Then there’s California’s ARCHES hub. Price ticket: $1.5 billion. This one leans closely on hydrogen for transportation. Public buses, gas cell vehicles, perhaps the occasional misguided hydrogen prepare. It’s a basic case of California attempting to want hydrogen vehicles into existence prefer it’s nonetheless 2003. The issue? Physics referred to as, and it needs its effectivity again. Whenever you run hydrogen by means of electrolysis, compress it, transport it, and convert it again to electrical energy in a car, you’ve thrown away about two-thirds of the unique vitality. Batteries beat this circus act in each metric that issues. Reducing funding right here? By chance good, and I hope they comply with by means of.

Subsequent up: the Midwest Regional hub spanning Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan. Budgeted at as much as $1.3 billion, this mission blends industrial and transport purposes, with hydrogen anticipated to return from a mixture of nuclear, renewables, and pure fuel paired with carbon seize. Each the transportation and the blue hydrogen are large purple flags, to not point out diverting current nuclear technology away from higher use instances. If this hub refocused solely on industrial use with inexperienced hydrogen, we’d have a dialog. As is, it’s a “no” from me. Minimize away.

The Mid-Atlantic hub—overlaying Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey—needs to spend $1.2 billion to develop new hydrogen pipelines, assemble truck-loading services, and use hydrogen trailers to attach producers and end-users. Focused purposes embody transportation sectors equivalent to vehicles, buses, and sanitation automobiles, in addition to industrial warmth and energy technology. A number of hydrogen for vitality use instances with a aspect order of losing current nuclear electrons. It is a feel-good initiative that ignores fundamental thermodynamics. Turning off the faucet right here is smart, regardless of how warped the underlying motive.

I assessed a few iterations of the Biden DOE’s hydrogen technique over the previous few years. The last one showed some improvement over its predecessor however remained essentially flawed, primarily serving the pursuits of the fossil gas business. The technique continued to misdiagnose hydrogen’s position, selling its use throughout transportation and industrial heating sectors the place extra environment friendly and cost-effective electrification options exist. Notably, the inclusion of hydrogen for temperatures above 300°C overlooks current electrical options able to reaching as much as 3,000°C. Moreover, the technique’s advocacy for hydrogen in business and residential heating is misguided, given the confirmed superiority of warmth pumps by way of security and economics.

A major concern was the technique’s continued emphasis on producing hydrogen from fossil fuels with carbon seize and storage. This strategy predominantly advantages the fossil gas sector, as most CCS purposes within the U.S. are tied to enhanced oil restoration—a observe incompatible with real local weather options. The technique’s shortcomings stem from its growth throughout the DOE, closely influenced by fossil gas pursuits, and missing substantial enter from sectors which can be the first shoppers of hydrogen as we speak, such because the ammonia business for fertilizer manufacturing.

The technique’s missteps have been largely compelled upon it by Congress assigning it to the vitality guys as a substitute of the commerce guys who take care of business, after which requiring that hydrogen be produced from coal and fuel, and requiring the prioritization of reuse of fossil gas infrastructure. No marvel it obtained issues as improper because it did the primary time, and didn’t get to actuality within the replace. The technique’s flaws have been mirrored within the hydrogen hubs, therefore the rationale none of them make loads of sense.

Now shift gears to carbon seize and storage, that perennial darling of the fossil gas business. First up: Challenge Cypress in Louisiana, a $550 million enterprise aimed toward capturing CO₂ from hydrogen manufacturing services and piping it 30 miles to underground storage. However let’s not get too misty-eyed—this isn’t inexperienced hydrogen from renewables. It’s blue hydrogen, birthed from pure fuel with a carbon seize band-aid slapped on. And that fuel? It leaks like a sieve. The U.S. oil and fuel sector spews methane throughout the panorama, and with methane’s international warming potential greater than 80 instances that of CO₂ over 20 years, the local weather math begins wanting bleak quick. CCS on the again finish can’t repair the upstream hemorrhaging. Whereas this mission could look respectable on paper, it nonetheless smells like a like swamp fuel. Canceling it isn’t capturing your self within the foot—it would simply be avoiding a protracted, gradual amputation.

Then there’s the South Texas Direct Air Seize hub. Half a billion {dollars} to suck CO₂ from ambient air and ship it down 50-plus miles of pipeline to storage. That’s a thermodynamic nightmare that drinks vitality like a dehydrated camel at an oasis. Direct air seize may someday assist mop up residual emissions, nevertheless it’s nowhere close to prepared for prime time. Possibly in 2050. Spending lots of of thousands and thousands now’s like ordering champagne for a celebration that hasn’t even been scheduled but. If Wright and firm need to cancel this one to save cash for Gulfstream jet gas subsidies, nicely—allow them to. The end result remains to be higher than the choice.

In the long run, it is a masterclass in stumbling backward into good choices. Sure, the administration is gutting clear vitality for all of the improper causes. Sure, it’s disproportionately focusing on blue states. However if you happen to squint previous the political pettiness, most of those proposed cancellations align with what vitality modelers, physicists, and anybody who’s ever heard of the second regulation of thermodynamics have been saying for years: hydrogen for vitality is a boondoggle, and CCS solely is smart in very slender, industrial use instances.

It’s not management. It’s not technique. It’s extra of the Trump Administration blundering across the China store of vitality, governance and diplomacy like a bull on crystal meth. However in a number of remoted instances, it’s the precise name. That in all probability means they gained’t comply with by means of.