Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on electronic mail. Or follow us on Google News!
In a submit by Emily Atkin on her HEATED Substack weblog at this time, she studies that Morgan Stanley is bullish on the air-con trade as a result of the Earth is getting hotter, which is able to result in elevated demand for air-con tools. It suggests folks ought to put money into A/C firms now and reap the rewards sooner or later as the worth of these shares rises. That appears to show past an affordable doubt that capitalism has no conscience. Speak about cashing in on human distress!
The idea of Atkin’s reporting is a bit by Corbin Hiar for Politician’s E&E News printed on March 31, 2025. Hiar discovered a somewhat beautiful assertion tucked into a secular report on the monetary prospects of the air-con trade: “We now expect a 3°C world,” Morgan Stanley analysts wrote, citing “recent setbacks to global decarbonization efforts.” These “recent setbacks” are immediately associated to the climate-killing insurance policies of the present administration that’s favoring fossil fuels and disparaging clear power insurance policies designed to cut back the extent of greenhouse gases within the environment.
Hiar writes the Morgan Stanley analysts decided that if the world does actually heat by 3º C, that would double the expansion fee of the $235 billion cooling market yearly from 3 to 7% by 2030. O, rapture! O, pleasure! There’s cash to be made! Possibly there may be an upside to this world warming stuff in spite of everything, a minimum of for the investor class. In case you’re not in it, sucks to be you. So sorry…NOT!
“The political environment has changed, so some of them are conforming to that,” Gautam Jain, a former funding banker who’s now a senior analysis scholar at Columbia College, informed Hiar when requested about Wall Avenue’s more and more dire local weather projections. “But mostly it is a rational business decision.” After all it’s, in case your idea of capitalism fails to incorporate the financial worth of a sustainable Earth. Different megabanks like Wells Fargo are backing away from their earlier local weather pledges and leaving the Internet Zero Banking Alliance, a United Nations-backed group spearheaded by Mark Carney, a former governor of the Financial institution of England and new prime minister of Canada.
Morgan Stanley Shrugs Off Local weather Hurt
Atkin notes that the capitalist stooges at Morgan Stanley didn’t appear in any respect involved about what a 3º C world would seem like, so she penned her personal evaluation. “A world warmed by 3° C is one that’s rapidly falling apart. Every single coral reef in the ocean is dead. Entire regions of the world are too hot for human life. Nature is continuously throwing tantrums — droughts, wildfires, powerful storms, and unimaginable rain, location depending. There are food shortages and mass extinctions. Up to 40 percent of the world’s economy is wiped out.”
The truth that the analysts skipped calmly over the horrors a hotter world has in retailer solely serves as an instance the overall absence of humanity within the chilly, darkish hearts of those analysts. However, hey…they’re solely appearing on the coaching they obtained in B College. They’re the symptom, not the trigger. For a visible illustration of what a 3º C means, please see the video from The Economist on the finish of this text.
“We expect cooling — critical to human health and productivity in many climates — to be a potent long-term growth theme,” the analysts wrote. Because the world will get hotter, they predicted the worldwide air-con market might develop by 41 p.c by the top of the last decade, as much as $331 billion. The evaluation additionally “outlines several dozen air conditioning businesses around the world that are likely to profit from a hotter world,” wrote The Guardian reporter Oliver Milman, who additionally obtained a duplicate of the report.
However wait, it will get worse. Since December, the six biggest US banks — JPMorgan Chase, Financial institution of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs — have all give up the Internet Zero Banking Alliance. “We are clearly seeing a broad retreat on climate from the finance sector,” Paddy McCully, senior analyst at Reclaim Finance, a gaggle that pushes monetary corporations to behave on the local weather disaster, informed Milman. “It is to a very large extent being influenced by Trump and his agenda of accelerating climate change, although also due to banks using Trumpism as an excuse to roll back commitments that they had never actually intended to keep.” Morgan Stanley’s investor analysis on air-con is “mind numbingly cynical”, McCully mentioned. “Especially as it comes just months after they first weakened their decarbonization targets and then quit the Net Zero Banking Alliance.”
“I would not characterize our view being that ‘climate change brings many upsides,’” Stephen Byrd, Morgan Stanley’s world head of sustainability analysis, informed Milman. “I would instead suggest that we will see large volumes of capital deployed to mitigate the impacts of climate change, and cooling (among other products, such as smart power grids) would be one such category of increased capital allocation.” Byrd desires us to imagine that Morgan Stanley has no ethical attachment to this discovering, Atkin says. Its analysts are merely reporting what they see and telling their purchasers, as is their obligation.” What he probably doesn’t perceive is that the banks’ air of detachment is exactly what that makes this report so nauseating, as a result of Morgan Stanley is under no circumstances indifferent from the long run consequence of local weather change. Certainly, if the world does attain 3° C, it is going to be partly due to them.”
Morgan Stanley is the sixth largest investor within the fracking trade. It is aware of these investments can not proceed if the world is to protect a secure local weather, which is why in 2021 it made a pledge to considerably rein them in. The financial institution was one of many founding members of the Internet Zero Banking Alliance, however assembly its targets would essentially imply phasing out funding for brand new fossil gasoline tasks. 4 years later, it appears like becoming a member of the NZBA was merely a ruse to get everybody off banks’ backs for some time, Atkin writes. In truth, from 2022 to 2023, Morgan Stanley elevated its annual funding of fossil fuels from $14.7 billion to $19.1 billion. In a 2024 studyresearchers at MIT mentioned, “Our evidence suggests that NZBA banks are neither divesting nor engaging differently from banks without a commitment.”
Right this moment, banks like Morgan Stanley have an ideal excuse to behave just like the planet’s future is out of their fingers. Shortly earlier than the latest inauguration, Morgan Stanley left the NZBA, however mentioned in an announcement that its “commitment to net zero remains unchanged.” Its web site says the financial institution nonetheless has aggressive local weather targets it intends to hit. Horse puckey. Morgan Stanley and its sister banks are greedy for each final penny they’ll discover and will care much less if the Earth turns into an overheated cinder partly due to their failure to behave in an ethical and accountable style.
Can Nothing Save Us From Capitalist Greed?
There is just one pressure that may restrain the unquenchable greed of the banking trade. If the insurance industry stops insuring fossil gasoline investments, the gravy practice will finish and there are indications it’s beginning to consider doing precisely that. All of it comes all the way down to gozintas and gozoutas. If more cash goes out of the insurance coverage firms’ coffers than goes in, their habits will change, not due to any ethical considerations about destroying the Earth however as a result of the earnings they’re used to will disappear. Nothing strikes worry into the hearts of capitalists like monetary losses. The one query will probably be whether or not the good awakening within the insurance coverage trade will come quickly sufficient to forestall a planetary disaster. Readers will in all probability have an opinion on that subject.
Whether or not you may have solar energy or not, please full our latest solar power survey.
Chip in just a few {dollars} a month to help support independent cleantech coverage that helps to speed up the cleantech revolution!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us here.
Join our each day e-newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or join our weekly one if each day is just too frequent.
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage here.
CleanTechnica’s Comment Policy