A comparability chart of system prices throughout totally different situations, which clearly demonstrates the financial benefits of mixing each networks. Credit score: Hofmann et al.
Over the previous many years, many nations worldwide have been attempting to regularly rework their vitality programs, with the purpose of lowering carbon emissions and mitigating the antagonistic results of local weather change. Hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2) transport networks, infrastructures designed to move hydrogen gasoline and captured CO2may help the shift in direction of climate-neutral vitality programs.
Researchers at Technical College Berlin carried out a research geared toward higher understanding the extent to which hydrogen and CO2 transport networks may contribute to the longer term de-carbonization of the European vitality system. Their paper, published in Nature Powermeans that each a lot of these networks may play a key function in establishing a sustainable and clear European vitality system.
“In our view, we’re envisioning a climate-friendly economic system which depends as little as doable on fossil fuels and respects socio-economic issues,” Fabian Hofmann, first creator of the paper, informed Tech Xplore.
“To achieve this, there is a general knowledge gap when it comes to the question of how we decarbonize the ‘hard-to-abate’ sectors. While it is clear that electrification and building out renewables (along with energy storages and transmission capacities) is the main route for most sectors, there are certain energy-intensive areas of the economy where we need to find alternative solutions.”
Hydrogen gasoline is commonly considered as a promising different to artificial fuels for offering inexperienced vitality in some industries. Two key examples are the aviation business, which depends on excessive quantities of artificial fuels, and the cement business, which is understood to emit giant quantities of CO2.
“Here carbon management becomes equally important: for synthetic fuels, where does the carbon come from; for the process-based emissions, where do we put them?” stated Hofmann.
“Naturally, the question arises whether it’s beneficial to fully integrate carbon management, including transport and storage, into the overall energy system. In our paper, we want to quantify this potential benefit and examine how hydrogen and carbon networks might complement or compete with each other.”
The important thing goal of the latest research by Hofmann and his colleagues was to make clear the extent to which hydrogen and CO2 networks may collectively contribute to future climate-neutral European energy systems.
To research this, the researchers constructed an in depth mannequin of Europe’s vitality panorama, utilizing an open-source software program platform known as PyPSA-Eur.
Utilizing this platform, they in contrast 4 totally different situations. Within the first state of affairs, there have been no specialised networks, within the second solely a CO2 community, within the third solely a hydrogen community and within the latter, each sorts of networks.
“Our model represents Europe as a network of 90 interconnected regions, where energy can flow between regions through transmission lines, pipelines, and other infrastructure—each with its own capacity constraints and losses,” defined Hofmann. “For hydrogen and CO2 pipelines, we considered realistic physical properties like compression energy requirements and transport losses.”
The researchers ran a full-year simulation with a temporal decision of three hours. This simulation was computationally possible, but it nonetheless allowed them to seize sufficient of the variability related to renewable vitality sources, in addition to the complicated interaction between the 2 sorts of networks.

A map displaying how hydrogen and carbon dioxide would movement throughout Europe in our optimum state of affairs, illustrating the complementary nature of the 2 networks. Credit score: Hofmann et al.
“For each scenario, we calculated the most cost-effective mix of technologies and infrastructure to meet Europe’s energy needs while achieving net-zero emissions by 2050,” stated Hofmann.
“This approach helped us identify whether it makes more economic sense to move hydrogen to where carbon is available, or to move carbon to locations where hydrogen can be produced cheaply, all while accounting for the real-world constraints of geography, weather patterns, and infrastructure limitations.”
The simulations run by Hofmann and his colleagues yielded some very fascinating outcomes. Firstly, they discovered that whereas each hydrogen and CO2 networks individually decreased prices in comparison with situations by which neither of them is current, a mixture of each networks was probably the most cost-effective, saving an estimated 41 billion euros yearly.
“The hydrogen network primarily serves to transport low-cost hydrogen from regions with very good renewable resources to industrial centers and to facilities that produce synthetic fuels,” added Hofmann.
“Meanwhile, the carbon network efficiently moves captured carbon dioxide from inland industrial sites to storage locations near coastlines. For policymakers and energy planners, our results emphasize the importance of coordinated planning across different energy sectors and national borders.”
The findings of this latest research may inform future interventions throughout the vitality business. Particularly, they counsel that as a substitute of viewing hydrogen and carbon infrastructure as separate or competing investments, policymakers and engineers ought to view them as complementary programs, as their constructive influence is considerably better when they’re mixed.
“Importantly, we found that these network configurations remain effective even when tightening climate targets to achieve net-negative emissions, providing a robust foundation for long-term infrastructure decisions,” stated Hofmann.
“While I’ve moved to a new position outside academia, I remain involved in energy system modeling, focusing more on developing the PyPSA software tools. My colleagues at the Technical University Berlin are working on a follow-up study that directly builds upon our findings.”
The brand new analysis that Hofmann’s colleagues are conducting explores the sensible implications of their latest outcomes, by evaluating the efficiency of PCI-PMI initiatives (Initiatives of Widespread Curiosity and Initiatives of Mutual Curiosity), focusing particularly on hydrogen and CO2 infrastructure.
The workforce’s outcomes, gathered utilizing a myopic modeling method, will supply new perception into how deliberate infrastructure initiatives may assist to satisfy European coverage objectives throughout totally different time horizons (i.e., 2030, 2040, and 2050).
“An important aspect of my colleagues’ work is quantifying the economic ‘regret’ or cost implications if pipeline deployments are delayed by one period, if they aren’t developed at all, or if certain policy targets are abandoned,” added Hofmann.
“This research will provide valuable insights for policymakers on the practical implications of infrastructure planning decisions and their alignment with Europe’s climate objectives.”
Extra info:
Fabian Hofmann et al, H2 and CO2 community methods for the European vitality system, Nature Power (2025). Two: 10.1038/S41560-025-01752-6.
© 2025 Science X Community
Quotation:
Assessing the potential of hydrogen and carbon dioxide networks for the way forward for European vitality programs (2025, Might 1)
retrieved 1 Might 2025
from https://techxplore.com/information/2025-04-potential-hydrogen-carbon-dioxide-networks.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Aside from any honest dealing for the aim of personal research or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for info functions solely.