Pipelines To Nowhere: The Real Costs Of TMX & The Dutch Hydrogen Network

Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and high level summariesjoin our daily newsletterand/or follow us on Google News!

Infrastructure megaprojects have an irresistible attract, and the Netherlands and Canada are illustrative of this. Governments, engineers, and industrial backers alike see in them the potential for transformative leaps ahead—large pipelines to maneuver vitality, corridors connecting assets to markets, and infrastructure that guarantees to underpin whole industries or vitality transitions.

But, repeatedly, these ambitions collide spectacularly with cussed realities: escalating prices, delays, and a seemingly inevitable drift towards heavy, persistent subsidies. The Canadian Trans Mountain Enlargement (TMX) pipeline is probably probably the most telling latest case, now joined by the rising story of the Dutch nationwide hydrogen pipeline community, every providing invaluable classes in monetary and planning pitfalls.

In Canada, the TMX pipeline enlargement was initially portrayed as a simple mission—lay a brand new pipe parallel to an current path to triple oil transport capability from round 300,000 to 890,000 barrels per day. The preliminary estimates within the early 2010s hovered round C$7 billion, a seemingly cheap worth to unlock Alberta’s heavy crude, delivering it effectively to coastal terminals and hypothesized high-value markets. But, as development dragged by means of a gauntlet of allowing hurdles, fierce public opposition, Indigenous rights challenges, and environmental controversies, prices ballooned dramatically. By the point it was lastly accomplished in 2024, complete prices had soared to over C$30 billion. This represents not merely a miscalculation however an existential price escalation—roughly 4 instances greater than initially projected.

Now the Dutch are navigating a strikingly comparable path, albeit with hydrogen reasonably than oil. The nationwide hydrogen community, meant to hyperlink key industrial clusters and ports equivalent to Rotterdam, Zeeland, and Groningen, was first pitched in 2023 at an appealingly modest worth of €1.5 billion. The Dutch authorities was banking on repurposing in depth parts of current pure fuel infrastructure, a plan initially touted as a low-cost, pragmatic answer. But, actuality rapidly set in.

Latest estimates from the Dutch Authority for Shoppers and Markets have proven prices swelling past €3.8 billion, greater than doubling the preliminary projections. Causes given for these overruns echo the TMX expertise—overly optimistic assumptions about reuse of current pipelines, surprising technical complexity, delayed allowing, and inflationary pressures throughout provide chains and labor markets. Dutch policymakers quietly acknowledge that the €3.8 billion determine stays unsure, with additional price escalation extremely possible as development progresses.

These two initiatives supply fascinating parallels not solely in spiraling prices however within the structural design of their funding and pricing mechanisms. TMX locked itself into long-term transport contracts, with charges fastened years earlier than completion. Shippers secured charges of roughly C$11.46 per barrel, charges so low they now cowl lower than half the pipeline’s precise capital prices. The monetary shortfall quantities to billions per yr, a everlasting and involuntary subsidy by Canadian taxpayers to the oil business. This underscores a important lesson: as soon as infrastructure tolls are locked in, revisiting them upward turns into politically and commercially unattainable, leaving taxpayers to completely fill the hole.

The Dutch hydrogen pipeline makes an attempt a special method, choosing regulated tariffs reasonably than fixed-rate contracts with customers. The federal government set an preliminary transport tariff at round €0.50 per kilogram of hydrogen—seemingly reasonably priced, meant to entice business and spur funding. Nevertheless, the regulator now warns that with out large ongoing subsidies, actual prices might attain eight instances this determine—€4 and even €6 per kilogram—driving hydrogen transmission prices to a stage that might render inexperienced hydrogen commercially unviable.

Whereas the Dutch authorities’s regulated tariff method affords extra flexibility than TMX’s locked-in contracts, it faces the same basic problem. Politically, tariffs can not often rise considerably with out extreme pushback from business and customers, successfully locking governments right into a everlasting subsidy construction harking back to TMX’s expertise.

Each initiatives additionally endure from persistent underutilization dangers, one other monetary black gap. TMX, even now operational, has round 20% uncommitted capability. This idle portion generates no income however nonetheless prices billions, constructed on overly optimistic market assumptions about Canadian oil demand development and export potential. The Dutch hydrogen pipeline faces even larger underutilization, initially near 70–80%.

With hydrogen manufacturing initiatives lagging, demand unsure, and vital infrastructure hurdles nonetheless forward, it stays unclear when or if utilization will ever attain economically sustainable ranges. Early underutilization dramatically amplifies prices per unit of transported vitality, making hydrogen prohibitively costly in its first decade or longer. Even optimistic mid-range situations projecting speedy uptake of electrolyzers and hydrogen demand seem deeply speculative, given present market and technological realities.

First-of-a-kind infrastructure dangers additional compound the challenges confronted by the Dutch hydrogen mission. Hydrogen itself is notoriously tough to deal with—embrittling metal pipelines, requiring specialised compressors, and demanding stringent security and purity requirements. Though the Dutch authorities initially counted on easy reuse of current pure fuel pipelines, nearer technical analysis revealed vital necessities for brand spanking new pipelines or pricey retrofits, introducing surprising complexity. This technological uncertainty, mixed with the inherently unpredictable timeline of a nascent hydrogen financial system, ensures that additional price overruns and delays are just about inevitable.

On this context, the pipeline’s present €3.8 billion estimate seems shaky at finest, with a remaining tally nearer to €5 and even €6 billion more likely.

Evaluating the delivered price per unit of vitality transported underscores these challenges starkly. TMX, closely sponsored by means of low toll charges, at the moment delivers oil transport companies at roughly C$1.9 per gigajoule—a deceptively modest determine, given taxpayers are absorbing no less than an equal quantity in subsidy. Hydrogen pipeline tariffs, even on the extremely sponsored preliminary charge of €0.50 per kilogram and optimistic volumes, are round €4 per gigajoule—greater than double TMX’s sponsored oil transport prices.

With out subsidy and with extra doubtless volumes, practical tariffs would leap to round €30 or extra per gigajoule, totally uncompetitive in comparison with fossil fuels, electrical energy transmission, and even trucking. This important comparability highlights a profound coverage dilemma: hydrogen pipelines inherently battle to realize price competitiveness resulting from hydrogen’s low volumetric vitality density, costly compression, and technical challenges.

Finally, the important thing query is whether or not governments ought to proceed investing closely in costly pipeline-based vitality corridors. TMX affords a stark warning—as soon as constructed, these property lock in a long time of taxpayer-funded subsidies, no matter shifts in market demand or technological alternate options. The Dutch hydrogen mission, whereas nobler in its local weather intentions, faces an eerily comparable fiscal trajectory.

Policymakers appear dedicated to subsidizing the hydrogen infrastructure indefinitely, pushed by political imperatives to stimulate industrial transformation and local weather progress. But the financial realities recommend a a lot harsher fact: these subsidies would possibly by no means disappear, doubtlessly turning into perpetual drains on public assets. Even modest utilization and uptake situations are optimistic; the middle- or high-end projections used to justify the initiatives seem speculative, bordering on wishful considering.

What’s doubtless is that that the €1.5 billion complete price of the pipeline will balloon to €5, volumes by means of the pipeline will stay small as a result of vitality markets for hydrogen will dissipate like mist, and the annual subsidies for the restricted pipeline use can be €1 yearly for a few a long time till the dangerous concept is scrapped solely. From €1.5 to €25 by means of dangerous assumptions and dangerous coverage received’t win buddies and affect voters.

Maybe probably the most basic lesson from each TMX and the Dutch hydrogen community is that vitality infrastructure is very pricey and unpredictable. The wiser coverage path might lie in focusing infrastructure investments on electrical energy grids and direct electrification pathways—applied sciences confirmed cheaper, extra environment friendly, and fewer weak to perpetual subsidies. Billions of public {dollars} might yield far larger local weather and financial returns by constructing electrical transmission infrastructure as a substitute of pipelines for fuels.

As policymakers world wide plan future vitality corridors, these classes ought to function cautionary tales, warning in opposition to repeating previous errors. In spite of everything, as Canada and now the Netherlands are discovering, the true price of infrastructure initiatives usually stays hidden till it’s too late—and taxpayers are left completely footing the invoice.