“Green” EU Investment Funds Full of Fossil Fuel Companies

Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and high level summariesjoin our daily newsletterand/or follow us on Google News!

To start with, let me notice that I’m an enormous fan of the ESG motion. Individuals must be investing in corporations with good environmental, social, and governance (ESG) insurance policies, and the motion to take action has had many strongly optimistic results. Nonetheless, because the motion has scaled up and grow to be mainstream, there’s been some apparent nook reducing and, dare I say, blatant dishonest of the system. One downside that has been raised a number of occasions earlier than is inclusion of fossil gas corporations in ESG or “green” funding funds. A brand new investigation from the Guardian and Voxeurop surfaces this downside once more.

The investigation discovered that “green” funding funds in Europe maintain greater than $33 billion in investments in oil and gasoline corporations. $33 billion in fossil gas corporations!

The argument, presumably, is that these corporations are doing inexperienced issues. We have to assist that, proper? Properly, if I’m rolling round 24/7 in a large coal-rolling diesel truck after which I experience my bike to the park as soon as a month, do I actually deserve reward and assist for that?

Greater than $18 billion of this “green” funding has been invested in TotalEnergies, Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, and BP — the 5 largest polluters on the planet. Are they considerably altering what they do to guard the local weather? No, they aren’t.

“Other investments by funds following EU sustainable finance disclosure regulations (SFDR) included those in US fracking company Devon Energy and Canadian tar sands company Suncor, the investigation by Voxeurop and the Guardian found,” the Guardian reports.

That is all types of unsuitable. A fracking firm and a tar sands firm?! You couldn’t get additional off the inexperienced path.

“Investors claim that holding a stake in a company allows them to influence the firm’s pursuit of climate goals. However, no major oil and gas producer has plans consistent with international climate targets and many companies have weakened their plans in the last year, according to a report from Carbon Tracker in April.”

Properly, that’s inspiring.

Naturally, it’s among the largest finance corporations on the planet which have been investing these billions in these “green” high polluters. It appears like they simply discovered a strategy to justify investing in the identical corporations they’ve at all times invested in — and, notably, among the largest, most worthwhile, and most polluting corporations.

Once more, the argument traders are making (and sharing with the Guardian when requested) is that their investments have been making a distinction and creating concrete change at these corporations. Nonetheless, all of it appears like lots like a easy magic trick. These corporations know that they should diversify and put money into the industries that may change them. Whether or not shopping for EV charging corporations or creating photo voltaic farms, that is widespread sense enterprise. “But, hey, if we can convince people we’re making green investments to be better, we can gobble up some of that ESG money.” I think about that’s roughly the way it goes.

Yow will discover extra particulars on the findings by way of the Guardian.

What do you consider these findings and the practices which have been underway?