Killing A Rescued Squirrel Sets Environmental Efforts Back

Join daily news updates from CleanTechnica on electronic mail. Or follow us on Google News!

Social media is abuzz with folks telling the story of Peanut the Squirrel, and his demise by the hands of New York state officers. Whereas the story has predictably turn out to be a partisan bickering match, I feel there’s a deeper downside with what occurred to Peanut that ought to spark multi-partisan concern. If something, folks of any get together who care about environmental safety and clear know-how ought to be condemning the killing greater than anyone.

Why Are Folks Arguing Over A Squirrel?

Earlier than I can get into why the story issues, I have to share the story in order that we will all be on the identical web page.

It began seven years in the past when a person in New York discovered a child squirrel that had been orphaned. It was too younger to outlive by itself, and the mom had been killed, so there was no approach to realistically re-wild the animal (as wild as animals in New York Metropolis will be, anyway). Unable to bear the considered the little squirrel dying, the person nursed the squirrel again to well being, elevating it to maturity.

As a result of it took so lengthy to get the squirrel to viability, it had turn out to be far too snug not solely with being fed, however being within the presence of individuals. So, even at maturity, he couldn’t flip the squirrel again out into the bushes at a park or one thing. He elected to maintain it as a pet to maintain it alive. He had additionally turn out to be connected to it, and it to him.

Ultimately, he began an Instagram and different social media channels, displaying folks the enjoyable he has together with his squirrel. It grew to become an enormous hit, with Peanut and his dad getting over 500,000 followers.

Senseless Enforcement

Sadly, it was unlawful to rescue Peanut and hold him as a pet. It’s a regulation that doesn’t get enforced that always, and many individuals do not know that the regulation prohibits holding wild animals as pets in some states. However some Karen in one other state was offended on the sight of a pet squirrel and known as the New York Division of Environmental Conservation to report this “crime.”

Together with a second rescued raccoon, the animals had been seized in an armed raid of the person’s condominium, traumatizing his household. The animals had been then taken away and killed by the company.

A Higher Approach: Prosecutorial Discretion

Sure, what the man did with the raccoon and the squirrel was unlawful underneath New York regulation. It might be silly to disclaim that. However, on the identical time, no regulation is ever enforced 100% of the time. As a result of enforcement assets are restricted and customary sense dictates that different actions are sometimes the higher approach, police and regulators of every kind have the discretion to resolve the way to deal with every case.

Typically, enforcement motion is required. Different instances, a warning is the appropriate approach ahead. It’s additionally attainable for enforcement businesses to coach violators and assist deliver them into compliance as an alternative of coming down onerous. In the end, the objective of all of those choices is to additional the aim of the company (on this case, defending animals and the surroundings) and to not run up numbers or get public consideration.

In truth, this primary thought goes again to Sir Robert Peel, the founding father of one of many first policing businesses globally. He taught this precept: “To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them.”

Whereas the regulation can’t give well-known folks higher remedy than non-famous folks, authorities brokers ought to contemplate that this was an amazing alternative to deliver extra folks into compliance with related wildlife legal guidelines nationwide. If NYSDEC had helped him fill out the suitable paperwork and get into compliance with the regulation, they may have additionally partnered with him in making a video educating the five hundred,000 followers on how they, too, can do that the appropriate approach. Had they accomplished this, the end result would have been superior.

This Units Again Efforts To Really Defend The Surroundings

I do know some readers don’t wish to admit that NYSDEC did something flawed, largely as a result of the Republicans try to show this mindless act of “enforcement” right into a political problem and even an election problem. Earlier than I’m going on, I wish to be clear: I don’t assist that. I feel folks just like the Trump household, the eyeliner-wearing VP candidate, and the entire different folks attempting in charge this on Kamala Harris are simply as senseless and idiotic as NYSDEC.

The straightforward reality is that this was a state company. For these unfamiliar or who fake to be unfamiliar, there’s an idea in US regulation known as federalism. State governments get pleasure from an excessive amount of independence from the federal authorities as a result of they’re sovereign states which have entered into an association for mutual protection and useful resource sharing. To try to pin this on a federal official (VP Harris) is ignorant at finest and deeply dishonest at worst.

That having been stated, folks of each or no get together ought to be upset about this, particularly these of us who care about environmental safety (ostensibly the rationale NYSDEC exists). Why? As a result of senseless killing of this kind offers the entire environmental safety enterprise a nasty identify.

Few environmentalists wish to violate anyone’s rights, implement a communist dictatorship, and mindlessly kill within the identify of the surroundings. When some unthinking state brokers go and kill a pet who had 500,000 followers on social media, they’re sending the message that environmentalists are, actually, evil individuals who care extra about preserving the ability of the state than defending precise animals.

Worse, when individuals who declare to be environmentalists defend this stupidity and evil, it confirms the fears folks have about environmental coverage. When far proper figures try to forged us all as evil, defending evil out of some misguided have to defend Kamala Harris performs proper into their palms!

If we’re sensible in any respect, we’d all be in opposition to this and name out NYSDEC for this. We must always all be calling for reforms in how these circumstances are dealt with, with training and animal security being the important thing objective as an alternative of senseless rule-following and energy flexing.

Featured picture: an AI-generated meme floating round social media protesting the demise of Peanut. (truthful use)